Cognitive Psychology Program
Graduate Curriculum
INTRODUCTION
The Cognitive psychology graduate program (CPGP)
seeks students with the intellectual potential, motivation and
quantitative aptitude to engage in productive scholarship in a basic or
applied area of interest.
Interdisciplinary training is also available in
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Developmental Science
- Aging and Cognition
- Child Language
- Quantitative Methods.
The training program emphasizes the development of a broad based foundation in theory, research methods, technical skills, and quantitative analysis for application in a variety of basic and applied research settings. Areas of focus of current faculty include memory, cognitive development, language, perception, attention, aging and cognition. The faculty are listed below. Consult with them for further information.
PROGRAM FACULTY MEMBERS
Paul Atchley (Program Director)
Ruth Ann Atchley
John Colombo
Joseph Dien
Andrea F. Greenhoot
James F. Juola
George A. Kellas
Susan Kemper
Thomas A. Schreiber
Gregory Simpson
Michael S. Vitevitch
GENERAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
(with recommended completion time)
Research Activity (Continuous)
Course Requirements (before Oral Comps)
Master's Thesis and Oral Defense (year 2 or 3)
Written preliminary examination (year 3 or 4)
FLORS (year 3 or 4)
Comprehensive Oral Exam (year 4 or 5)
Dissertation and Oral Defense (year 5 or 6)
Other occasions of evaluation that may be agreed upon are public oral presentations, as in the CPGP proseminar and at professional meetings, manuscripts submitted for publication, written examinations on particular topics preparatory to the oral comprehensive examination, consulting activities, performance as an intern, and so on. The student can expect timely feedback from his or her advisor and from other CPGP faculty members.
Each student will meet annually in the spring semester with their advisor in order to assess progress toward the degree. At these meetings all evaluative information about the student will be reviewed. The results of the meeting will be presented by the student's advisor to the faculty of the CPGP at it's annual student evaluation meeting. The director of CPGP will then inform the student, in writing, of his or her standing in the CPGP.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Statistics/Methods Core (12 units by end of third year)
PSYC 790:
Statistics I
PSYC 791:
Statistics III
PSYC 982:
Professional Issues
PSYC 983:
Methods
Content Core (9 units by end of second year)
PSYC 723:
Advanced Cognitive Psychology
PSYC 725:
Cognitive Neuroscience
PSYC 737:
Psycholinguistics
PSYC 757:
Perception
PSYC 831:
Human Memory
Breadth/Depth (12 units before Oral Comps)
Breadth I, II
Depth I, II
Breadth/depth courses may come from a number of sources, depending upon student interests and advisor suggestions. Students are expected to use this requirement to gain additional specialization in two areas in addition to cognitive psychology. Examples include Quantitative (which will consist of courses in psychology and PRE), Language (including Linguistics or Speech-Language-Hearing), Neuroscience (including Psychology, Biology, or Pharmacology), Philosophy, or Computer Science. These courses can also be used to help fulfill FLORS requirements with "breadth goals" set out by the advisor.
Seminar (continuous enrollment)
PSYC 902
MASTER'S THESIS
The master's thesis process is intended to provide the student
with the opportunity to serve an internship in their chosen lab, with
their chosen advisor. The student is expected to demonstrate competence
conducting laboratory research in their chosen area. As such, the
master's thesis serves as a natural point to evaluate the suitability of
a student for continued progress in the CPGP. Instances of substandard
performance are expected to be rare. The thesis is evaluated by a
committee consisting of three members, two of which must be from the
CPGP. Thirty units of coursework are required before the granting of the
master's degree.
Substandard performance during master's thesis research and master's thesis defense can include the following specific problems:
- Failure by the student to show adequate active participation and effort during the completion of the necessary components of the research project including: research design, data collection, data analysis, and thesis manuscript preparation and revision.
- Evidence (as provided in either the written document or in the oral defense of the thesis) that the student does not have a reasonable understanding of the theoretical and methodological issues addressed in the thesis project.
- Evidence (as provided in either the written document or in the oral defense of the thesis) that the student does not have the research or analytical skills necessary for the completion of subsequent phases of the doctoral training program.
During the deliberation of the Master's Thesis Committee following the Master's Thesis defense, any committee member can propose that the Master's Candidate has failed to reach standard performance on the master's thesis project. At this juncture the committee will discuss the option of dismissal from the program. If the majority of the Master's Thesis Committee recommend (via hidden ballot) dismissal of the student from the program then there will be a meeting called of program faculty.
The student will be notified of this recommendation and allowed to appeal to the faculty prior to the final vote. Following discussion of the recommendation and a student's appeal, a vote will be held (again via hidden ballot). If a majority of the faculty present vote for dismissal of the student then academic dismissal will be effective at the end of the semester in which notification of dismissal is given by the program.
WRITTEN PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION
While the master's thesis is the opportunity for a student to
demonstrate competence in conducting laboratory research, the written
preliminary examination is the opportunity for the student to
demonstrate their ability to become independent, critical thinkers in
their chosen research area. The expectation is that students will
demonstrate the ability to think carefully about the literature in their
chosen field, and independently generate an evaluation of the field.
They are further expected to be able to express themselves cogently in a
written format. The written preliminary examination committee consists
of three members, two of which must be from the CPGP.
Unlike other requirements, this requirement is required by the CPGP and not the Graduate School. Thus, the form of this written examination varies depending upon the desires of the student, their advisor and their written preliminary examination committee. Formats have included an extensive review paper of a chosen research area, multiple smaller papers on a variety of research areas, or a grant proposal which may be later submitted to a funding agency.
FLORS REQUIREMENT
The Graduate School's FLORS requirement may be fulfilled by CPGP
students in the following ways: The student may complete the foreign
language option or the computing skills option as specified by the
Graduate School. In consulting with his or her advisor and advisory
committee, the student may satisfy the FLORS requirement by
demonstrating competence in areas such as quantitative methods,
including psychometrics or mathematical modeling of psychological
processes, beyond the required course sequence in statistics and
methodology; cognitive science beyond cognitive psychology, such as
artificial intelligence, computer simulation of cognitive processes, or
programming skills; or neuroscience techniques, such as brain imaging
and mapping, or mastery of physiological data collection. Lastly, the
student may propose a research skill not covered above by petitioning
the CPGP, which, if it approves, will seek approval of the Department of
Psychology and the Graduate School.
ORAL COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION
The Program recommends students entering without a Master's degree
to take the oral comprehensive examination before the end of the fourth
year. For those entering with a Master's degree, the recommendation is
by the end of the third year. Prior to asking the Department to request
the Graduate Division of the College to schedule the comprehensive
examination, the student must (1) have taken all the required courses,
(2) have been accredited with a research skill, (3) have obtained a
Master's degree, (4) have passed the written preliminary examination or
an approved alternative (CPGP) and (5) have met the residency
requirements. The oral comprehensive examination committee is made up of
five faculty members, at least one of whom is from outside the
Department and represents the Graduate School. The exact form of the
examination is not specified by the Graduate School, but is intended to
cover the student's major area and should review the student's plans for
a doctoral dissertation. The Program requires the student to prepare a
written dissertation proposal and to distribute it to the committee
prior to the scheduled examination. The committee shall judge the
student's performance as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. If the
performance is judged to be unsatisfactory, the student may request
another examination at the end of 90 days. This examination may not be
taken more than three times. Unsatisfactory performance on the third
occurrence means termination from the Program and loss of
doctoral-student status in the Department.
CANDIDACY
After passing the oral comprehensive examination, the student
becomes a candidate for the doctoral degree. At this point, a
dissertation committee of three members of the Graduate Faculty is
formed, the Chairperson of which is authorized by the Graduate School to
chair dissertations. From this point onward, the student must be
continuously enrolled until the degree is earned. Enrollment must be 6
hours every semester and 3 hours in the summer until 18 hours of credit
have been accumulated. Beyond this, the number of hours should reflect
the workload of the faculty involved with the dissertation and the use
of University resources.
FINAL ORAL EXAMINATION
The dissertation must be written in final form and orally defended
before the dissertation committee, plus two additional members of the
Graduate Faculty, within eight years. (Notes: (i) The final oral
examination may not be scheduled until five months have elapsed since
passing the oral comprehensive examination. (ii) The three-person
dissertation committee must have formally approved the dissertation
typescript as ready for defense prior to the scheduling of the final
oral examination.)
NOTE ON COMMITEES (CPGP)
The committees for a student's Master's thesis, oral comprehensive
examination, and doctoral dissertation will ordinarily consist mostly of
faculty members of the Program. Each such committee must include at
least two faculty members of the program and be composed of a majority
of faculty who are members of the department.



top